Jump to content

Talk:Olaf Stapledon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

H.G. Wells and Olaf Stapledon==

[edit]

Could someone elucidate the nature of the disagreement between the two? As it is, it seems to suggest H.G. Wells was opposed to both organized religion and religious yearnings, when (if I'm not mistaken) Wells was in fact a theist -- for part of his life, at least. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.98.117.119 (talk) 14:47, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

I've added the information that OS was a strong influence on Brian Aldiss, and slightly modified the contention that CS Lewis's Cosmic Trilogy was written "in response" to his work. Lewis was at least as concerned with repudiating the ideas of HG Wells and GB Shaw. - Phil Purser-Hallard

Stapledon worked with Quakers during the war and admired them. He also had spiritual interests that don't quite fit with his agnostic or deist views. That said he had no interest in religion, he was just more positive on Quakers then most. There is Robert Crossley's biography and other sources to confirm that.--T. Anthony 13:47, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Lewis praises Stapledon in The Abolition of Man but elsewhere refers to Stapledon's conception of God (in Star Maker) as amounting to Satanism. I'll look for the references. Xanthoxyl 14:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Lewis called it "devilish" or "diabolical", I have him saying so in my notes somewhere, but there's times when this seems to just be an expression he uses to mean "arrogant and bad." I read a collection of Lewis's letters and in the period when he thought religion was wishful-thinking nonsense he still called things he didn't like "devilish." That said the God in Star Maker is somewhat callous and that could seem like a form of dystheism which is sometimes seen as relational to Satanism.--T. Anthony 22:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's high time we had a picture here. - R.Gemmel

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:20, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stapledon maintained a long correspondence with Woolf

[edit]

(Stapledon maintained a long correspondence with Woolf) appears in the name dropping section. Both direct to disambiguation pages. I'm ambiguated. MartinSFSA (talk) 04:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks not needed here; one links the last name of the subject, which would be circular; the other is linked earlier in the same sentence.
Thanks, Yworo! MartinSFSA (talk) 09:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olaf Stapledon signature.svg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Olaf Stapledon signature.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Olaf Stapledon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]