Jump to content

Talk:2004 United States election voting controversies, Florida

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For a previous debate over the deletion of this article see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/2004 U.S. Election voting controversies, Florida.

KB, what do you mean by voter turnout? is that registered voters? --kizzle 22:16, Nov 10, 2004 (UTC)

Maths

[edit]
Collier: 83,485 + 43,713 +104 +179 + 82 +65 +129 +595 = 128,352
Duval: 219,251 + 158,121 + 169 + 628 + 140 + 34 + 53 + 1,218 = 379,614
Glades: 2,443 + 1,718 + 3 + 4 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 16 = 4188
Highlands: 25,874 + 15,346 + 27 + 28 + 12 + 4 + 12 +188 = 41,491
Lake: 74,382 + 48,216 + 129 + 230 + 97 + 82 + 143 + 659 = 123,938
Miami-Dade: 358,613 + 406,099 + 490 + 630 + 317 + 226 + 179 + 1,999 = 768,553
Okaloosa: 69,654 + 19,358 + 95 + 171 + 41 + 5 + 11 + 372 = 89,707
Orange: 192,390 + 193,217 + 237 + 588 + 120 +22 + 37 + 1,141 = 387,752
Osceola: 43,108 + 38,617 + 32 + 91 + 34 + 9 + 7 + 280 = 82,178
Leon: 51,594 + 83,830 + 87 + 255 + 47 + 11 + 14 + 476= 136,314
Palm Beach: 211,894 + 327,698 + 575 + 616 + 226 + 155 + 106 + 1,565= 542,835
Volusia: 111,552 + 115,335 + 131 + 333 + 69 + 20 + 31 +911= 228,382

From http://enight.dos.state.fl.us/ at 10pm EST on 11/12/04

--Alex Krupp 03:50, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)

Cleanup/major shortening

[edit]

Okay, it's a huge edit (and a lot of deleting), so here's a quick summary:

  • Two images were broken and removed.
  • I'm not exactly sure what a "machine shortage" is: a shortage of votes? A shortage of machines? If someone could clarify, that would be great.
  • Blank sections were removed; the rest of it was condensed into a single article.
  • Several links were taken out as they are no longer valid.
  • There are two blatant copyright violations that have been commented out.
  • "No real explanation has been given" is in the wrong tense; a more pressing problem is the use of "real" explanation, which is evidently meant to contrast with "phony" explanation.
  • There can be absolutely no source for the statement that "in all cases, the overvotes are heavily in George W. Bush's favor".
  • I removed the template about Florida elections, although I wouldn't object too much if someone put it back in. My rationale is that this article does not discuss an actual election, but merely alleged irregularities in one.
  • I scrapped the table. It was starting to become an indiscriminate collection of information; an entire table is not needed to get to the point, which is the total number of overvotes.

I think the article may now be ready for merging. I slapped a POV tag on it just in case, anyways -- it could probably still be considered a mess. theProject 04:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]