Jump to content

Talk:Lesley-Anne Down

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

the north and south link is wrong..--Delpino 11:35, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

File:Lesley-Anne Down 2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Lesley-Anne Down 2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:01, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lesley-Anne Down. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lesley-Anne Down. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relationship with Robinson would have been illegal

[edit]

Is it certain she was in a relationship with Bruce Robinson from 1969 OR was she born before 1954?

The age of consent is 16 in England & Wales. If she was born in 1954, she would have been just 15 in 1969 - and Bruce Robinson would have been arrested, charged, convicted, and jailed for several years for having sex with a girl under the age of consent. And he WOULD have been caught because she was a well-known teenage model.

So, it seems likely the relationship began in 1970 or later; OR that her year of birth was 1953 or earlier, not 1954.

2601:645:8002:61B0:8CCC:5C08:4FCD:1A25 (talk) 11:23, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is possible to be in a relationship - ie be someone's girlfriend - without actually having sex, and not uncommon at that age. However, the citation for the relationship does not work. Sbishop (talk) 11:52, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]