Jump to content

Talk:Reg Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

There are lots of facts about how many weights he could lift but, in a serious 'pedia (pause for laughter), I'm not sure he deserves more than this. What do you all think? -David91 20:26, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Whatever do you mean? In the early days of bodybuilding, how much a 'builder could lift was part of his cred/resume, it wasn't all for show; even now comparative strength is an issue at hte top level....Skookum1 (talk) 18:18, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Reggie Parks

[edit]

Might I suggest mentioning that Reg Park is not the same as Reggie Parks, former pro-wrestler and championship belt maker. Throughout the years, I've noticed many people think they are one in the same. --72.226.98.49 02:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just deleted the false info confusing him with beltmaker Reggie Parks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.60.105.211 (talk) 20:24, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Text says: "After one year of hard training, Park earned the title of Mr. Britain in 1949."

Info under the picture says: "Pro-debut: Mr Britain, 4th, 1946"

One of these has to be wrong.

180.183.147.100 (talk) 15:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Reg Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]