Jump to content

Talk:Civil Air Patrol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleCivil Air Patrol is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 12, 2005.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 1, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
May 7, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
March 15, 2008Featured article reviewDemoted
May 15, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
May 24, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 5, 2008Good article nomineeListed
September 5, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 1, 2014, December 1, 2021, and December 1, 2022.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of May 2, 2005.
Current status: Former featured article

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]

I propose merging National Blue Beret (which is marked with "{{notability}}") into Civil Air Patrol. I think the content in "National Blue Beret" can easily be explained in the context of "Civil Air Patrol", and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in "Civil Air Patrol".MarcRic::Ruby (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the (very) late response, but I would suggest that if it were merged anywhere the target should be National Cadet Special Activities rather than the main CAP article. It doesn't really have a place here. Huntster (t @ c) 20:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why does a topic about an American institution use dmy dates?

[edit]

These are not standard in America. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 06:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like an old GA that hasn't stood the test of time, unfortunately. Large number of uncited sentences and paragraphs, some from as far back as 2010. The article also overwhelmingly cites the CAP itself, which is a violation of WP:RS's requirement that articles be based on independent sources. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.