Jump to content

Talk:Lizz Winstead

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Is the "offensive comment" this: [1]? Samrolken 09:00, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

-- It's the "blow me" thing, yes. 69.181.199.238 (talk) 03:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The second reference's link did not work, making it impossible to verify the material. It's therefore unsourced and was tossed as per the warning at the top of this page. Either way, Michelle Malkin is hardly impartial and an op-ed is not a credible news source.

Ongoing "Discussion" re: Tweets

[edit]

There is a continuing disagreement by one user about the inclusion of the Oklahoma Tornado Tweet Incident in Lizz Winstead's bio. Their objection have been that the reference sources are not acceptable to them, and that this incident is not relevant in the entirety of her life. This seems to me to be an attempt to apply a very editorialized version of this bio. Is the information true? Yes. Have valid references been provided? Yes. ABLegler (talk) 20:26, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is it biographically significant? If a neutral source were writing about her life and times in a few pages would this be one of the significant events worth including? I have no opinion on that. The material itself is a little embarrassing but it is sourced, and presented neutrally. So the only question is whether it's relevant and significant, or else whether it's ephemeral trivia. - Wikidemon (talk) 21:56, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The two provided sources are of extremely low quality. One is an MSN news aggregator that has picked up a gossip blog, and the other is the FOX News website in a short article that doesn't substantiate its "outrage" claims. Either way, ABLegler's original research of "public backlash" is unsupported. This is a clear violation of WP:BLP, and WP:BLPGOSSIP in particular. There's no evidence that this is a significant biographical event in the life of the subject. -- Scjessey (talk) 14:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If your primary arguement is the sourcing then I suggest you stop now, because you have zero argument. I realize that you don't like the source, but they are RS's so deal with it. Arzel (talk) 15:33, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The quality of the sourcing, especially for a BLP, is absolutely atrocious. They aren't even attributed columns. Did you even look at the sources, Arzel, or did you just see "Fox News" and give it a thumbs up? -- Scjessey (talk) 17:26, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lizz Winstead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lizz Winstead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lizz Winstead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

Is Lizz Winstead her actual name? The link for Mary Elizabeth Winstead is posted at the top, making me think her actual name was Elizabeth Winstead. Once verified, this should be stated in the article.AprilShowersBringMayFlowers (talk) 23:09, 15 March 2018 (UTC)AprilShowersBringMayFlowers[reply]