Jump to content

Talk:Catherine, Princess of Wales

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateCatherine, Princess of Wales is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleCatherine, Princess of Wales has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowIn the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 19, 2005Articles for deletionKept
October 26, 2005Articles for deletionKept
April 27, 2017Good article nomineeNot listed
August 4, 2018Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
December 21, 2023Good article nomineeListed
June 8, 2024Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 26, 2024Peer reviewReviewed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 9, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Catherine, Princess of Wales (pictured), is a keen amateur photographer and the patron of the Royal Photographic Society, and has taken many official photographs of her children?
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on November 17, 2010.
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Pinned Thread: Consensus on usage of "Catherine" vs. "Kate", "Kate Middleton"

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The Wikipedia Community has reached a consensus on "Catherine" vs "Kate" in favor of Catherine. Please do not post threads on this subject without at least reading the following threads:

There are numerous additional threads on this subject in the archives as well. Safiel (talk)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Image alteration scandal in lede

[edit]

The lede mentions nothing about her image alteration scandal or cancer diagnosis. This seems fit for that section, no? natemup (talk) 19:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Her cander treatment probably should be but the image alteration was trivial and soon blew over. Not worth including in the introduction. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Catherine recently released a video in which she announced the completion of her chemotherapy treatment and how she is looking forward to staying "cancer-free".
Even Sarah, Duchess of York, suffered from cancer recently but has since then undergone treatment which has deemed her cancer-free. Hence her article lead does not state it.
It's a similar case with Catherine. Unless, it's serious and has a major impact on her life (not one year of public engagements), it would not be worthwhile to have it in lead. I would still prefer including it later on if it does become serious. Looking forward to what others have to say on this. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 08:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that Catherine is married to Prince William suggests that her medical condition and treatment will have a much more noticeable impact than the comparable circumstances on Sarah? Martinevans123 (talk) 08:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]