Jump to content

Talk:Ontario Highway 404

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOntario Highway 404 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starOntario Highway 404 is part of the 400-series highways series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 5, 2011Good article nomineeListed
April 27, 2015WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
June 21, 2015Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 21, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Untitled

[edit]

Wasn't there a joke about this? Or was that the European one?

It would be great if you couldn't find it - Highway 404 not found error... Rich Farmbrough, 14:09 7 February 2007 (GMT).

404 error citation

[edit]

This "citation" was a link to an article on Uncyclopedia. That's not an acceptable source, so I've removed it and added a fact tag. Flyguy649talkcontribs 06:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Uncyclopedia is a 404 error page specifically about this highway so would show that this joke exists. I'm not sure what you're trying to prove here... if the only point is that a joke had been made, a jokebook would be the source - not a scholarly reference tome. Try searching online for the words "Internet error highway" and you will find Uncyclopedia isn't the first to spot this link.

Ontario Highway 7275

[edit]

Speaking of 404 errors, a link to Ontario Highway 7275 fails with a highway 404 error. The page name redirects here but any mention of Ontario Highway 7275 on this page is not found. This is an error, as a redirect target normally at least mentions the redirected topic -- usually boldly right in the intro. I'd suspect a few of these below-tertiary provincial road stub numbers redirect to an article for some main road with no indication as to why the reader is being sent there or where the stub road connects. --66.102.83.61 (talk) 21:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

7275 is or was a temporary designation for the northern extension prior to its opening. There are many such redirects that aren't explained since the secret designations are unposted. Its certainly not important enough for the lead... Perhaps a blurb in the history. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 02:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

History

[edit]

For myself when I get here, or to an interested highway enthusiast:

  • Planned - 1957[1]
  • Extension of the DVP north of Toronto was officially announced February 1965
  • Opened in 1977 as "Highway 404"[2]
  • Extension from Aurora Road to Davis Drive in Newmarket opened on October 24, 1989[3][4]


References

  1. ^ Don Valley Parkway Extension, Highway 401 to Steeles Avenue (Report). Desjardines. 1957.
  2. ^ Filey, Mike (2006). "Parkway with a Past". Toronto Sketches 9 : "the way we were". Dundurn Press. pp. 151–153. ISBN 1-55002-613-5. Retrieved April 12, 2010.
  3. ^ http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/thestar/access/471099001.html?dids=471099001:471099001&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct+24%2C+1989&author=Peter+Howell+Toronto+Star&pub=Toronto+Star&desc=Highway+404+extension+to+increase+traffic+flow&pqatl=google
  4. ^ http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/thestar/access/471099001.html?dids=471099001:471099001&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct+24%2C+1989&author=Peter+Howell+Toronto+Star&pub=Toronto+Star&desc=Highway+404+extension+to+increase+traffic+flow&pqatl=google

With regard to extensions to 48/12

[edit]

These are well established plans, with an environmental assessment completed. Well beyond the "Highway 410 to Collingwood" notion, and more like the 400 to Sudbury. Anyways, transportation plan to 2011 shows up to Ravenshoe Road. Bradford Bypass has been removed from the York plan, iffy in the GH plan, and certainly not "under construction".

Based on these, I would say it's in the design phase, but we'll know for certain what the future holds after the next provincial election. Until then, I'm trying to find the MTO document with the proposed interchange locations. The distances/exit numbers should be removed if they are still there for the future sections. Regardless, the extension is well sourced, just the route it takes isn't. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 17:24, 18 May 2010 (UTC) Well based on the notices put in the globe and mail requesting the publics input, those interchanges were mentioned - at least to Ravenshoe Road. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.112.29.158 (talk) 22:09, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]